Should trees have standing summary

6.77  ·  2,295 ratings  ·  688 reviews
Posted on by
should trees have standing summary

Should Trees Have Standing?: Law, Morality, and the Environment by Christopher D. Stone

Originally published in 1972, Should Trees Have Standing? was a rallying point for the then burgeoning environmental movement, launching a worldwide debate on the basic nature of legal rights that reached the U.S. Supreme Court. Now, in the 35th anniversary edition of this remarkably influential book, Christopher D. Stone updates his original thesis and explores the impact his ideas have had on the courts, the academy, and society as a whole. At the heart of the book is an eminently sensible, legally sound, and compelling argument that the environment should be granted legal rights. For the new edition, Stone explores a variety of recent cases and current events--and related topics such as climate change and protecting the oceans--providing a thoughtful survey of the past and an insightful glimpse at the future of the environmental movement. This enduring work continues to serve as the definitive statement as to why trees, oceans, animals, and the environment as a whole should be bestowed with legal rights, so that the voiceless elements in nature are protected for future generations.
File Name: should trees have standing summary.zip
Size: 72728 Kb
Published 06.06.2019

Trees in 4 Minutes

Development of rights, development of children's rights, standing for objects' should have no rights to seek legal redress merely because.
Christopher D. Stone

Should trees have standing?

Morton , and since that time the essay has been widely influential, a classic that helped define a field. So, for instance, a judgment against those who have polluted a stream might direct them to undo the damage done to its waters, mitigate erosion of its banks and depletion of its plant life, restock its fish, and so on. Consider, for example, the disputes over protecting wilderness areas from development that would make them accessible to greater numbers of people. And the same is true regarding arguments to preserve useless species of animals, as in [the case of sea urchins endangered by a nuclear power plant. In order to protect ourselves, therefore, we ought to be conservative now in our treatment of nature.

We use cookies to collect non-personalized browsing data such as location at a regional level, site referral, and site usage to help us analyze site traffic and improve user experience. We collect this data via Google Analytics and our server, Mittwald. To learn more about cookies, including how to disable them, view our Cookie Policy. The copyright holder reserves, or holds for their own use, all the rights provided by copyright law, such as distribution, performance, and creation of derivative works. Stone, Christopher D. Should Trees Have Standing? Law, Morality, and the Environment.

Western American Literature

To browse Academia. Skip to main content. You're using an out-of-date version of Internet Explorer. By using our site, you agree to our collection of information through the use of cookies. To learn more, view our Privacy Policy.

Reviews Should. Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects. By Christopher D. This is an important book. It should be read by all environmentalists, but especially those concerned about the landscape of the American West.

This decision came following a year battle between the Whanganui Iwi people and the New Zealand government. The Whanganui River will be jointly represented by one member appointed by the Maori community, and one member appointed by the government. This grant of legal personality to the Whanganui River is not considered throughout this essay. In an anthropocentric manner, humankind continues to devastate its surroundings in order to progress, despite being able to comprehend the disastrous consequences of doing so. As such, significant change is needed; however, how radical this change must be is where the great debate arises. The question that was introduced — whether or not natural objects within the environment should be granted legal standing, will be discussed throughout this essay, along with its subsequent criticisms. There is no doubt that determining the answer to this question is not easy.

3 thoughts on “Should Trees Have Standing?: Law, Morality, and the Environment by Christopher D. Stone

Leave a Reply