Social Theory and the Politics of Identity by Craig J. CalhounThe new social movements of the post-war era have brought to prominence the idea that identity can be a crucial focus for political struggle. The civil rights movement, anti-colonial movements in the Third World, the womens movement, the gay movement - all have sought the affirmation of excluded identities as publicly good and politically salient. The rise of identity politics is also linked to an increasing recognition that social theory itself must be a discourse with many voices. An increasingly transnational sphere of public and academic discourse - and increasing roles for women, gay men and lesbians, people of color, and various previously excluded groups - impels all social theorists not only to make sense of differences in the world-out-there, but to make sense of differences within the discourse of theory. This collective volume is the product of that conviction.
Identity (social science)
In order to set up a list of libraries that you have access to, you must first login or sign up. Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen. You also may like to try some of these bookshops , which may or may not sell this item. The National Library may be able to supply you with a photocopy or electronic copy of all or part of this item, for a fee, depending on copyright restrictions. Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes. Please enable cookies in your browser to get the full Trove experience.
Please take this quick survey to tell us about what happens after you publish a paper. Sociological Forum. This paper applies a social movement organization framing analysis to conflicts between gay-rights and Christian Right groups over issues of lesbian, gay, and bisexual inclusions in public education. As groups representing each side entered this new arena of debate over gay rights, they applied strategies they had used in other arenas. Both sides have pursued inflexible, polarizing strategies that target their constituencies and have relinquished the opportunity to offer new and creative understanding of their positions and to reach a potential new audience.
Identity politics, also commonly referred to as the politics of identity or identity-based politics, is a phrase that is widely used in the social sciences and humanities to describe the deployment of the category of identity as a tool to frame political claims, promote political ideologies, or stimulate and orientate social and political action, usually in a larger context of inequality or injustice and with the aim of asserting group distinctiveness and belonging and gaining power and recognition. Central to the practice of identity politics are the notions of sameness and difference, and thus the anthropological study of identity politics involves the study of the politics of difference. The monographs and edited volumes in this section offer a wide range of perspectives, and cover a wide breadth of issues, pertinent to the study of identity politics. Gledhill offers a general overview of the politics of identity in everyday life. Sociologist Craig Calhoun Calhoun helps to build a bridge between the fields of identity politics and social theory and is frequently cited by anthropologists writing about the politics of identity. Gupta and Ferguson traces the distinctive interconnections between place-making, subject formation, and practices of resistance. Rutherford explores the opportunities and challenges, which are presented by the ever-growing diversity of communities, cultures, and identities, for a new radical democratic politics.
A psychological identity relates to self-image one's mental model of oneself , self-esteem , and individuality. Consequently, Weinreich gives the definition:.
night of the day of the dawn of the son
In this commentary I take issue with Torpey's claim that political developments at the dawn of the new millennium caused liberal democracies to tilt away from those visions that have the potential of promoting an inclusive and just society. I argue that the politics of identity and its modes of repair do not necessarily undermine these visions but rather render them often possible and even infuse them with their true meaning. I present my argument against Israel's recent policies to privatize state-owned lands and of the various strategies employed by different social groups to influence these policies in their favor. These policies, I claim, involve all the ingredients that figure in Torpey's lamentation against the politics of identity and its modes of repair. But nonetheless, and in contrast to his condemnation of identity politics, I present this account with the aim of underscoring its significance and of stressing the importance of reparation as a means to promote equal and full citizenship. My claim is that social and political arrangements in the nation-state are so ordered — either formally or informally — that they promote the interests of the dominant groups, based on their alleged past contribution to the res public, i.